Similar Articles

NEW FOR THURSDAY: Next June Packed With Events In Ocean City Including Dew Tour

OCEAN CITY – Although it is good news that the town has filled i...READ MORE

NEW FOR MONDAY: Wicked Storm Leads To Water Rescues In Berlin

BERLIN -- Perhaps no area was hit harder by the weekend’s feroci...READ MORE

Budget Transfers OK’d To Save After School Academies

SNOW HILL -- With schools opening their doors next week and options ru...READ MORE

New Md. Scooter Laws Take Effect In Five Weeks

OCEAN CITY -- The resort area’s vast scooter-riding community re...READ MORE

BFC Maintains Scheduling Control At Root Of Dispute

BERLIN -- The town of Berlin this week pulled all Berlin Fire Company ...READ MORE

More Work Needed On Airport Runway To Pass Inspection

OCEAN CITY – A failed inspection of a recent runway project at t...READ MORE

Wicomico Council Seeking To End Tow Company Gouging

SALISBURY – Months after the City of Salisbury attempted to addr...READ MORE

Mixed Results In Worcester Health Report Card

SNOW HILL -- While improvements have been made in areas like cutting d...READ MORE

Berlin Horse Farm Provides Respite For Kids

BERLIN -- Several physical miles and a million symbolic miles away fro...READ MORE

Referendum Wording Presented For Fall Election

BERLIN -- When local voters head to the polls this fall, in addition t...READ MORE

County Wants No Involvement In Mystic Harbour Drain Issue

8/24/2012 | By Staff Writer, Travis Brown

SNOW HILL -- The Worcester County Commissioners re-affirmed their commitment this week to not get involved in a storm drain situation in Mystic Harbour that threatens to produce sinkholes on area properties.

Public Works Director John Tustin briefed the commission Tuesday on the results of an inspection of a “supposed collapsed storm drain” that is the source of sinkholes in Mystic Harbour yards. After revealing that blockages were noted during the inspection, Tustin made sure to explain that the county isn’t liable for fixing any of the problems.

“The pipe is not on county-owned land nor was it built by the county,” he said in his report. “Therefore, I believe it is not the county’s responsibility to maintain. The location of the pipe is obviously owned by Mr. Jack Burbage and helps drain portions of Maryland Route 611, which is a state highway.”

Tustin said that Worcester has no interest in the matter and should be wary about being dragged into the situation. Public Works Deputy Director John Ross felt likewise and informed the commission that if the county decided to fix the storm drain in this instance, a disturbing precedent could be set.

“It will be important to identify the owner of the pipe before we begin this work because once we begin making the repairs, it will most likely become ours forever,” Ross wrote in a memo.

According to Tustin, whoever does make the necessary repairs will be looking at a lot of man hours and the probable need of an outside contractor.

After hearing of the work required and confident that the county didn’t have a horse in the race as far as ownership of the pipe, the majority of commissioners agreed it would be best not to become involved.

“I don’t think we should get involved,” said Commissioner Louise Gulyas.

If Tustin’s report identified the storm drain as “obviously” being owned by Burbage, then Worcester isn’t liable, she reasoned.

“This is definitely a Mr. Burbage problem …” said Gulyas.

Gulyas recommended writing a letter to Burbage asking him to address the problem. Commissioner Judy Boggs advised against even drafting a letter as that is more immersion into the scenario than she is comfortable with.

“I think the solution has to come from the property owners and not the county,” she said.

Additionally, Boggs mentioned that she hopes once the commission makes a decision it sticks and the issue doesn’t arise again.

“We can’t continue to spend time on this if it’s not our problem,” she said.

Attorney Sonny Bloxom reminded the commission this isn’t the first time the Mystic Harbour storm drain problem has come before them.

“We told them [we’re not involved] before but they didn’t like our answer,” he said of property owners that have previously asked the commissioners to intercede.

Unlike his colleagues, Commission President Bud Church initially pushed for a small amount of involvement from the county. Church asked that the commission approve some further camera inspections at a different point in the pipe. However, Church dropped the motion when it became clear that his colleagues wanted to put the matter to rest.

Eventually, the commission voted 5-2, with Boggs and Commissioner Virgil Shockley opposed, in favor of a revised version of Gulyas’ motion, which will mean a letter will be sent to the State Highway Administration, Burbage, the Mystic Harbour Homeowners Association and property owners in the area urging cooperation between the parties.

There are 1 comment(s).


Sure glad we sold last Aug. and moved far far away from Mystic Harbour. Now the Hoa fees will be sky high now. Property values will really go down. Lost money on sale of house because of all the forclosures in there. So get ready people or move. Gotta love Jack Burbage all the money he got he should fix the problem himself, after all thats where he made his money.
submitted by Joseph W. Haines on August 27, 2012 at 11:53 am

Leave a comment

Please complete all required fields.
Name*
Email
Comment*

Submit