Decency Rules Deserve Council Consideration

typewriter2

Whether Ocean City should follow Wildwood, N.J.’s decision to institute a decency ban will be discussed next month, and there are strong opinions on both sides of the issue.

We think Ocean City should create an ordinance outlining exactly what is permitted on the Boardwalk only and pass it immediately, but only after legal counsel decides what will pass Constitutional muster.

Two years ago, the former council was not interested in addressing the issue and a public discussion never took place. The new council has at least shown a willingness to consider it, as the topic has been scheduled for a work session meeting.

Creating a “decency” ordinance to outlaw such offensive clothing as baggy pants that can be enforced equitably could go a long way in demonstrating officials will do whatever it takes to protect Ocean City’s family reputation. That’s a message that needs to be disseminated, particularly in light of recent weeks when young, entitled punks intent on intimidating and wreaking havoc have been roaring through town.

Additionally, setting a standard of acceptable wares will help protect Ocean City’s investment in its infrastructure.

Ocean City’s jewels in its crown are the beach, bays, ocean and Boardwalk. There are others, but these are the main draws. Protecting and enhancing all of them are priorities. Millions of public dollars are spent to do that. The town just made an $8 million investment over two years with the reconstruction of the Boardwalk. That means the property owners did as well because it was their money that essentially funded it. In our view, retaining a certain class and family atmosphere of the Boardwalk should be the town’s top priority.

If the council agrees a decency ordinance is a necessary direction, the question is how to execute this desire within the Constitution. Wildwood probably gets by with its baggy pants ban with other specific references, such as requiring foot protection and mandating shirts be worn to cover breasts on the Boardwalk.

We think creating a legal set of rules for attire is necessary. It’s the least we can do to safeguard the reputation of the Boardwalk, which has been viewed as an unsafe place in recent weeks. Setting a standard that raises the bar a notch is okay. It’s not like jean shorts, backward hats or sleeveless shirts would be banned. A public place could most likely not evade legal challenge and is not afforded the same protection as private establishments, like Seacrets where a specific dress code exists.

In our view, this ordinance would be largely symbolic in nature, but exactly what Ocean City needs.

It’s no secret it has been a rough start to the busy season and the weekend of June 7-9 is one that will be discussed at length in future weeks and months. Over the course of that weekend and at other times, gang activity was present in Ocean City, and there were a number of associated criminal incidents linked to that fact. This will not be discussed often publicly, but various law enforcement representatives have confirmed that. For instance, a stabbing victim, who was dumped in a hotel lobby after a Boardwalk altercation, is reportedly not cooperating with police and instead is looking to address the issue when he recovers and returns home.

With that incident and others in the spotlight and topping citizen concerns, Ocean City is primed to send a message and perhaps passing an ordinance creating a level of decency of acceptable attire standards will show town officials are going to be strict on what it will tolerate.

With recent weeks being comprised of largely negative headlines that have concerned visitors as well as residents, this might be the kind of reactionary exposure that demonstrates a significant commitment.

3 comments on “Decency Rules Deserve Council Consideration

  1. It is going to take a lot more than a decency ban to get Ocean City the family image it is looking for. When riding on the haunted house ride on the boardwalk, the scariest part is when the car comes out and you can look out and see the hoards of ghetto wannabe thugs and white trash below. This place has gone down hill over the last 20 years, and its only getting worse…. Good luck… I think I’ll head to Dewey.

  2. I can’t agree with the line of reasoning that says that the dominant style of the younger generation should be banned, regardless of how stupid it looks. Listen, the same atrociously bell-bottomed, pot-smoking hippies that the old folks bitched about destroying the beach 40 years ago are the ones who are running the place now. I mean, I could come down to O.C. right now wearing a three-piece suit and take a drunken piss on the boardwalk and litter the beach with food trash. I can also harass vacationers and locals alike while wearing a smart pairing of khaki shorts and a polo shirt.

    As a matter of fact, the last few times I’ve stayed in O.C., it was the forty-something, loud-mouthed, Eddie Bauer-wearing, minivan-driving types that were the biggest turn-off to enjoying the local night-life. They had no regard for their surroundings and no consideration for other people. I had not one problem with a teenager in baggy pants.

    Mr. Green, I’d like to know exactly what is ‘offensive’ about baggy pants, sir, as you have suggested in the fourth paragraph of this ridiculous piece. I mean, I find salmon-colored ties offensive, but what sets them apart from the baggy pants? Is it the people who wear them? Oh. Well there’s a clue that you may be off-target in trying to pin the blame on clothing instead of people, and that despite calling it a ‘decency law’, it’s still ‘profiling’.

  3. You are insane. Literally insane.

    You are unAmerican if you wish to enforce moral obscenity laws based on your own silly opinion of what is “offensive”. Baggy pants? Offensive? How?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

HTML tags are not allowed.